There’s Something About Millicent

Cherie Burns follows the life and fashion of Standard Oil heiress and muse to many, Millicent Rogers

As a child, Millicent Rogers probably had no idea how much influence she would have on fashion and style in the early 20th century. She was rather sickly, known for being shy, and spent most of her time reading books and trying to avoid falling ill—a rather mundane beginning for the glamorous flapper and woman-about-town that Rogers would later become. She seems to have lived the American Dream: her family was new money (her grandfather was a grocery clerk turned whaler turned American industrialist) and Rogers herself was an heiress it-girl, an American archetype as eternal as the cowboy. She came to represent quintessential American style before people even knew what that was, mixing high-fashion and traditional garments from around the world and wearing denim long before it was considered fashionable to do so. She would have looked right at home in a Ralph Lauren ad from the ’70s.

Cherie Burns’s book is a fairly standard biography—there are randomly dispersed facts chronicling the miniscule details of various parties, mansions, tours of Europe, mentions in Vogue, and all of her lovers and husbands (though all this information is not always presented in an organized fashion). And of course, the book covers all of the designers she wore and influenced–Schiaparelli, Charles James, and Rudolph Valentino, to name a few.

One of the more fascinating parts of the book is about Rogers’s war years, when she hosted events for the USO and other relief groups. At one point she worked for the State Department, which was chronicled in the pages of Vogue, like so much of her life. Rogers had no shortage of love affairs in Washington—while she was there she met both Roald Dahl and Ian Fleming. She was really into Brits in uniform at the time. She worked incredibly hard during the war, and her connections and creativity served her well, but because she was an heiress she didn’t get paid (even though she actually didn’t have as much money as people thought).

I was intrigued by Rogers’s decision to move to Taos, New Mexico in the later part of her life, and her involvement in the Native community there. At the end of the ’40s, Rogers was introduced to the American southwest by artist friends and became obsessed with the place, particularly the sartorial culture of the Pueblo Indians. She quickly established herself as what may be called a Native rights advocate, and introduced their traditional jewelry and fashions to the outside world. In 1947 she left her palatial mansions on the coast to lead a simpler life closer to the Pueblo. She died in New Mexico in 1950, when her poor health finally caught up with her.

For me, Searching for Beauty raised a lot of interesting questions about fashion and appropriation, though that is not the book’s intent or something it addresses explicitly. Rogers was well known for appropriating the native dress of many of the countries and places she visited, starting with her European sojourn in her late teens/early twenties and ending with the Pueblo Indians. Rogers was a study in contradictions on this point—on the one hand, she often bought these items from the people who wore them, and understood their significance (she was known for going to the ceremonies of the Taos in proper ceremonial dress), but then she had them sent to European designers like Schiaparelli to be copied. The Millicent Rogers museum, which is made up of Rogers’s fantastic collection of Native American jewelry, art, and textiles, is known for preserving these artifacts. Still, she was one of the first people known to make appropriating clothes from other cultures fashionable, and I couldn’t help but think that Rogers, without intending to, contributed to the mainstreaming of First Nations dress. Did she have a hand in young white people wearing headdresses and major fast fashion corporations making offensive “Navajo” underwear? No one seems to have written a really great book about this, though the internet provides a couple of good options for those who want to know more: Native Appropriations and a Native fashion magazine, Native Max.

photography // Brianne Burnell

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

Something Old, Something New

Crushing on up-and-coming designer Mani Jassal

The idea of tradition was ever present at this year’s Mass Exodus runway show. Many of the collections had a vintage feel; there was the ’50s housewife hair and summer dresses, the ’70s candy-coloured furs, and the dandy menswear. It was also the event’s 25th anniversary, and while the speakers opening the show acknowledged the prestigious past of Ryerson’s fashion program (Stacey McKenzie gave a very warm speech on her own experience with the school) there was also a lot of talk of the event’s new location in the Mattamy Athletic Centre. The change in scenery gave the event a new found sense of grandeur. Mass Ex 2013 was experiencing a similar transition to the designers: they’ve spent years steeped in fashion traditions, but now it’s time to innovate.

Mani Jassal’s collection was a perfect example of this balancing act. With some help from her seamstress mom and endless inspiration from her hero Alexander McQueen, Jassal created a line that gives a fresh face to perhaps the most traditional garment of all: the wedding dress. Luxurious and rich, with laser-cut fabrics and sequined details, the gowns have a (surprisingly) ’90s sensibility. We talked to Jassal, pictured below in Spongebob t-shirt and jorts, about her recent foray into bridal wear and the massive amount of work that went into her premier collection.

How did you dress in high school?
Completely different than the way I dress right now. I had my Air Jordans and I had the matching shoelaces. It was very sporty, very ’905.

What was the first piece of clothing you designed?
In Grade 8 we did a class project where we made an ‘innovative creation.’ I made a pink sequined dress, no shape or darts or anything, with a little pocket at the back that you could put your iPod in. It was really ugly and Spandex-y but it was one of the first things I made.

This was the first time you showed a collection, what was it like seeing your stuff go down the runway?
It was kind of surreal, because this is what we’ve been working towards since first year. Pulling all-nighters, tears, sweat, blood—literally blood because I would hit myself with needles—it’s all for this big show at the end.

What was your inspiration behind this collection?
The architecture of the Taj Mahal. The murals are reflected in the laser cutting in my collection and the fabric prints. The colours in my collection are very regal and royal as well. I also wanted to do a more modern take on South Asian bridal wear so I used leather, which is typically never used, and I used slashing techniques on it. I incorporated the more edgy stuff.

Would you say your collection is explicitly bridal wear or more formal wear?
I wanted to change my theme—don’t tell the prof—but I wanted to change it to formal wear because that better reflected my collection. But, when I talked to my prof she said I had to re-do all my research to accommodate my change in target market, so I decided to just stay with bridal wear.

But really your dream wearer would be anyone?

Exactly, if it’s your anniversary, if its your birthday, whatever you want to wear it to. It’s for anyone who wants to wear an extravagant dress.

How did you get the laser cutting done? Do you guys learn how to do that?
We don’t learn how to do it. I collaborated with a friend, she’s very good with Illustrator, and she created all the motifs for me based on my designs. I took the motifs to Toronto Laser Services and they did everything for me. Of course, I found out after everything was done that the architecture kids at Ryerson have a laser cutter.

Since we’re talking about the immense amount of work that went in to your garments, was the laser cutting time consuming or where there other elements that took a lot of work?
The laser cutting wasn’t that complicated because I wasn’t doing it, a machine was doing it. It was more complicated to apply the sequins, which I had to do by hand. I would pull an all-nighter and wouldn’t finish so I’d leave the bowl of sequins for my mom to work on when she woke up early in the morning, I wouldn’t have been able to do this collection without her. My skirts also needed to be hand hemmed so my mom did that, along with my aunt. We were allowed to contract people who could completely make everything but I just got my mom and my aunt to help me.

What was your favourite collection at Mass Ex?
It’s kind of biased to say my friends right? It would have to be Jayson Araja, who opened the show with an all white collection. And Yusun Kang, who did laser cutting as well.

Now that you’ve graduated, how do you feel about the fashion design program? Do you think it’s a good route for aspiring designers?
I definitely think so. Before I started at Ryerson I didn’t know that much about the fashion world. I was only really conscious of brands like Chanel, Gucci, Louis Vuitton. But once you’re in design you just learn so much more. You also network so much. Now I know lots of photographers, makeup artists, and models.

So, you’re going to Paris next week. Where are you most excited to go when you get there?
The Eiffel Tower. It’s so cliché but it’s one of those little girl dreams. I’m going with Jason and Yusun for our graduation trip.

photography // Laura Tuttle
styling // Lydia Chan

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

Pretty, not Punk

The best of the "worst" at the Met Ball

The annual Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Costume Institute Benefit Gala tends to be the one place celebrities experiment with their fashion choices. Of course, this means the press’s worst-dressed lists are twice as long as best-dressed ones. But they’re SO wrong. Sure, pretty much no one stuck to the night’s “Art Punk: Chaos to Couture” theme, and in their failed attempts and pure disregard for it, the collective group of attendees managed to pull together one of the most lackluster, all-over-the-place set of gowns I’ve seen in a while. But luckily some people had the good sense (and you might be surprised who) to embrace the experience and show some life with their choices. In the end these controversial pieces made our best-dressed list.

1 // Kim Kardashian, Ricardo Tisci for Givenchy

When I first saw this dress on Monday night I thought it was awful, but I couldn’t really look away. The dress’s built-in gloves and peony floral print put me into an optical illusion-type daze from which I somehow emerged a fan (okay, it also took a little cajoling from some fellow Wornettes who pointed out that this may just be the best thing Kardashian has ever worn). It breaks all the so-called rules of wearing prints or dressing during pregnancy. It’s adventurous and sophisticated and hugs every-last curve. Kanye West was heard singing, “Let nobody bring you down, you’re so awesome” to Kardashian during his performance at the event and I couldn’t agree more. By not letting her pregnancy dictate her style, she’s suddenly become a role model for us all.


2 // Katy Perry, Dolce and Gabbanna

Over-the-top accessories aside, Perry managed to dress up without over doing it in this Fall 2013 beaded and sequined dress. It shines and sparkles with religious glory and makes a canvas out of Perry’s form. She’s known for her theatrical costumes, so the unconventional choice doesn’t surprise me, but just how much I love it kind of does. Maybe it’s my pleasant memories of gleaming mosaics in Venice’s San Marco Cathedral (the designers were inspired by the walls of Sicily’s Catedral de Monreale). Or maybe it’s the teased curls, pale skin, and burgundy lips that are just dramatic enough to stand up against the dress while inspiring images of a castle-dwelling renaissance woman. Either way, she looks like the kind of sparkly religious idol you’d gladly take home as a souvenir.


3 // Kristen Stewart, Stella McCartney

Looking closely at the first three entries on this list, I’m surprised at how my expectations have been defied by women who are not typically commended for their fashion choices. Granted, K-Stew is often styled in admirable pieces, but the visible discomfort with which she wears them almost always undermines the effort. In the case of this jumpsuit however, the choice of pants over a dress seems to put Stewart more at ease. Meanwhile, the lace paneling adds a feminine touch, and the matching burgundy eye shadow brings out her signature steely gaze.


4// Zachary Quinto, Designer Unknown

Blue hair does not a worst-dressed candidate make, though that is what some other lists would have you believe. God forbid any of the men in attendance try to dress in line with the night’s theme. The history of men’s fashion has a lot more to offer than just slim-cut tuxedos, after all. Quinto’s tailored vest and crisp white shirt paired with satin paneled pants and gold detailed loafers gave him a pirate-like appeal, while the blue-tipped diagonal Mohawk reminded everyone that dressing up should be fun.


5 // PSY, Designer Unknown

Why Psy was at the Met Ball at all remains a mystery to me, but he put some A-list celebrities to shame with his attire. A short red and black checkered jacket with thin lapels and a single button harkened the punk theme while his black and white wing-tipped shoes and round sunglasses added a touch of ’50s glamour. This is how to do put-together punk.


6 // Solange Knowles, Kenzo

So both Knowles sisters missed the theme of the night, but Solange out-wowed her sister by far. Staying true to her bold print, big hair style in a black and mazarine wave jacquard split-front dress by Kenzo, she looked like she took a cue from her sister’s Foxy Cleopatra wardrobe. It was one of the few blue dresses on the carpet and Solange’s confidence sold it. She looks like a sexy ’70s goddess and we love it.

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments